Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?

Michael R. Greenberg; Frank J. Popper; Heather Barnes Truelove

doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.623070

Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?

Michael R. Greenberg, Frank J. Popper, Heather Barnes Truelove

Vanderbilt University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	713-731
Number of pages	19
Journal	Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volume	55
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.623070
State	Published - Jul 2012
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Geography, Planning and Development
Water Science and Technology
General Environmental Science
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Keywords

LULUs
NIMBY
TOADS
affect heuristic

Access to Document

10.1080/09640568.2011.623070

Cite this

@article{d1e621cfa74e46408c4e8d70d9cd5da0,

title = "Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?",

keywords = "LULUs, NIMBY, TOADS, affect heuristic",

author = "Greenberg, {Michael R.} and Popper, {Frank J.} and Truelove, {Heather Barnes}",

year = "2012",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1080/09640568.2011.623070",

language = "English",

volume = "55",