Evidence of bias in NCAA tournament selection and seeding

B. Jay Coleman, J. Michael DuMond, Allen K. Lynch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We investigate bias in the selection and seeding decisions of the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Committee. Using data on 910 teams associated with the ten tournaments from 1999 to 2008, we test for bias toward teams from seven ‘major’ conferences and six ‘mid-major’ conferences, as well as for bias toward teams represented on the Committee. We find substantial support for the hypothesis of bias in favor of virtually all major and mid-major conferences in selection and/or seeding, as well as evidence of bias toward majors over mid-majors. We also find substantial evidence of bias toward teams with some type of Committee representation.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)431-452
Number of pages22
JournalManagerial and Decision Economics
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Keywords

  • Basketball
  • Bias
  • Business & Economics
  • College athletics
  • College basketball
  • Conference tables
  • Conferences
  • Decision theory
  • Division
  • Economics
  • Games
  • Geographic regions
  • Management
  • Modeling
  • representations
  • seeding
  • Social Sciences
  • Statistical Bias
  • Statistical significance
  • Tournaments & championships

Disciplines

  • Business Administration, Management, and Operations

Cite this