TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the 'finite bias anomaly' in planar GaAs-superconductor junctions caused by point-contact-like structures?
AU - Chaudhuri, S.
AU - Bagwell, P.F.
AU - McInturff, D.
AU - Chang, J.C.P.
AU - Paak, S.
AU - Melloch, M.R.
AU - Woodall, J.M.
AU - Pekarek, T.M.
AU - Crooker, B.C.
N1 - Chaudhuri, S., Bagwell, P. F., McInturff, D., Chang, J. C. P., Paak, S., Melloch, M. R., Woodall, J. M., Pekarek, T. M., & Crooker, B. C. (1999). Is the ‘Finite Bias Anomaly’ in planar GaAs-superconductor junctions caused by point-contact-like structures? Superlattices and Microstructures, 25(5–6), 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1006/spmi.1999.0758
PY - 1999/5
Y1 - 1999/5
N2 - We correlate transmission electron microscope (TEM) pictures of superconducting In contacts to an AlGaAs/GaAs heterojunction with differential conductance spectroscopy performed on the same heterojunction. Metals deposited onto a (100) AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure do not form planar contacts, but, during thermal annealing, grow down into the heterostructure along crystallographic planes in pyramid-like ‘point contacts’. Random surface nucleation and growth gives rise to a different interface transmission for each superconducting point contact. Samples annealed for different times, and therefore having different contact geometry, show variations in dI / dV characteristics of ballistic transport of Cooper pairs, wave interference between different point emitters, and different types of weak localization corrections to Giaever tunneling. We give a possible mechanism whereby the ‘finite bias anomaly’ of Poirier et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2105 (1997)], also observed in these samples, can arise by adding the conductance of independent superconducting point emitters in parallel.
AB - We correlate transmission electron microscope (TEM) pictures of superconducting In contacts to an AlGaAs/GaAs heterojunction with differential conductance spectroscopy performed on the same heterojunction. Metals deposited onto a (100) AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure do not form planar contacts, but, during thermal annealing, grow down into the heterostructure along crystallographic planes in pyramid-like ‘point contacts’. Random surface nucleation and growth gives rise to a different interface transmission for each superconducting point contact. Samples annealed for different times, and therefore having different contact geometry, show variations in dI / dV characteristics of ballistic transport of Cooper pairs, wave interference between different point emitters, and different types of weak localization corrections to Giaever tunneling. We give a possible mechanism whereby the ‘finite bias anomaly’ of Poirier et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2105 (1997)], also observed in these samples, can arise by adding the conductance of independent superconducting point emitters in parallel.
KW - Finite Bias Anomaly
KW - GaAs superconductor
U2 - 10.1006/spmi.1999.0758
DO - 10.1006/spmi.1999.0758
M3 - Article
SN - 0749-6036
VL - 25
SP - 745
EP - 755
JO - Superlattices and Microstructures
JF - Superlattices and Microstructures
IS - 5-6
ER -