TY - JOUR
T1 - Mr. ATOD’s Wild Ride
T2 - What Do Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs Have in Common?
AU - Courtwright, David T.
N1 - David T. Courtwright, “Mr. ATOD’s Wild Ride: What Do Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs Have in Common?” Social History of Alcohol and Drugs 20 (2005): 105-124,
https://alcoholanddrugshistorysociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/shadv20n1xcourtwright1.pdf
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - All researchers agree that individuals can become intoxicated by and dependent on alcohol, tobacco, and other psychoactive drugs. But they have disagreed over whether, and to what extent, drug pathologies comprise a unitary medical problem. Most critically, does addiction have a biological common denominator? Consensus on this question has shifted back and forth. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, physicians often studied and treated various drug addictions together, working under the “inebriety” paradigm. By the mid-twentieth century the inebriety paradigm had collapsed. Tobacco and alcohol had split off, both in the medical research community and in western popular culture. This article argues that neuroscientific, genetic, epidemiological, and historical evidence helped to reunify the addiction field in the late twentieth century. A new unifying paradigm emerged, variously called chemical dependency, substance abuse, or simply ATOD—alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs.
AB - All researchers agree that individuals can become intoxicated by and dependent on alcohol, tobacco, and other psychoactive drugs. But they have disagreed over whether, and to what extent, drug pathologies comprise a unitary medical problem. Most critically, does addiction have a biological common denominator? Consensus on this question has shifted back and forth. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, physicians often studied and treated various drug addictions together, working under the “inebriety” paradigm. By the mid-twentieth century the inebriety paradigm had collapsed. Tobacco and alcohol had split off, both in the medical research community and in western popular culture. This article argues that neuroscientific, genetic, epidemiological, and historical evidence helped to reunify the addiction field in the late twentieth century. A new unifying paradigm emerged, variously called chemical dependency, substance abuse, or simply ATOD—alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs.
KW - medical history; alcohol; tobacco; drugs; addiction; chemical dependency; substance abuse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447136295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447136295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/shad20010105
DO - 10.1086/shad20010105
M3 - Article
C2 - 20058396
SN - 1930-8418
VL - 20
SP - 105
EP - 140
JO - The Social History of Alcohol and Drugs
JF - The Social History of Alcohol and Drugs
IS - 1
ER -