TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceived utility of official athletic Twitter accounts
T2 - The opinions of college athletic administrators
AU - Dittmore, Stephen
AU - McCarthy, Shannon T.
AU - McEvoy, Chad
AU - Clavio, Galen
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - The impact of Twitter on sport organizations has been examined from a number of perspectives and theoretical frameworks (Dittmore, Sanderson, Clavio & Pegoraro, 2013). Much of that research has focused on individual motives for using Twitter, such as interactivity and information seeking, but a yet unexplored area is why organizations use Twitter. The current study examines intercollegiate athletic administrators' views of the perceived utility of Twitter as a form of marketing or communication. One hundred eighty-eight usable responses from the population of athletic directors, sport information directors, and marketing directors from 340 NCAA Division I schools were used. Results show the majority of official athletic department Twitter accounts are run by Sports Information/Media Relations and the top three target publics are alumni, students, and existing ticket holders. Additionally, three factors were identified on the scale indicating communication purpose: Interpersonal, Informational, and Promotional. For the interpersonal factor, Athletic Directors and Marketers scores statistically significantly exceeded scores of Sports Information Directors, however, classification within Division I had no statistically significant effect.
AB - The impact of Twitter on sport organizations has been examined from a number of perspectives and theoretical frameworks (Dittmore, Sanderson, Clavio & Pegoraro, 2013). Much of that research has focused on individual motives for using Twitter, such as interactivity and information seeking, but a yet unexplored area is why organizations use Twitter. The current study examines intercollegiate athletic administrators' views of the perceived utility of Twitter as a form of marketing or communication. One hundred eighty-eight usable responses from the population of athletic directors, sport information directors, and marketing directors from 340 NCAA Division I schools were used. Results show the majority of official athletic department Twitter accounts are run by Sports Information/Media Relations and the top three target publics are alumni, students, and existing ticket holders. Additionally, three factors were identified on the scale indicating communication purpose: Interpersonal, Informational, and Promotional. For the interpersonal factor, Athletic Directors and Marketers scores statistically significantly exceeded scores of Sports Information Directors, however, classification within Division I had no statistically significant effect.
UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273319686_Perceived_utility_of_official_university_athletic_Twitter_accounts_The_opinions_of_college_athletic_administrators
M3 - Article
SN - 2333-1577
VL - 6
SP - 286
EP - 305
JO - Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics
JF - Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics
ER -