Abstract
Regional conflicts have the potential to become a danger for the world community. Examples are the old Israeli-Palestinian and the new Russian-Ukrainian conflicts. The current study investigated preferences for conflict-resolution strategies in these 2 international conflicts and predictors of these strategy preferences. Past research has focused on cognitive variables as predictors of conflict-resolution strategies. The current study focused on concern about the conflicts, religiosity, gender, and left-right political attitudes as potential predictors and was conducted in the streets of Berlin, Germany, with a heterogeneous sample of 229 participants. Whereas low religiosity, high concern, and right-leaning political attitudes predicted aggressive conflict-resolution strategies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, none of the variables predicted aggressive conflict-resolution strategies in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. It is possible that novelty of the later conflict and geographical proximity to Berlin as well as mistrust toward the United States and Russia lead to no clear-cut opinions regarding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 230-234 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2018 |
Keywords
- Conflict
- Conflict resolution
- International Relations
- Political Attitudes
- Religiosity
- Aggressive Behavior
- Test Construction
- religiosity
- aggression
- conflict-resolution strategy
- international conflict
- political attitudes
Disciplines
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Sociology