The Israeli-Palestinian and the Russian-Ukrainian conflict: Perception and conflict-resolution strategies.

C. Dominik Dominik Guess, Ilaha Safazada, Margaret Schaffer, Jacqueline-Marie Cash, Yaakov Bekhor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Regional conflicts have the potential to become a danger for the world community. Examples are the old Israeli-Palestinian and the new Russian-Ukrainian conflicts. The current study investigated preferences for conflict-resolution strategies in these 2 international conflicts and predictors of these strategy preferences. Past research has focused on cognitive variables as predictors of conflict-resolution strategies. The current study focused on concern about the conflicts, religiosity, gender, and left-right political attitudes as potential predictors and was conducted in the streets of Berlin, Germany, with a heterogeneous sample of 229 participants. Whereas low religiosity, high concern, and right-leaning political attitudes predicted aggressive conflict-resolution strategies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, none of the variables predicted aggressive conflict-resolution strategies in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. It is possible that novelty of the later conflict and geographical proximity to Berlin as well as mistrust toward the United States and Russia lead to no clear-cut opinions regarding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)230-234
Number of pages5
JournalPeace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Conflict resolution
  • International Relations
  • Political Attitudes
  • Religiosity
  • Aggressive Behavior
  • Test Construction
  • religiosity
  • aggression
  • conflict-resolution strategy
  • international conflict
  • political attitudes

Disciplines

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Sociology

Cite this