The Use of the ETS Major Field Test for Assurance of Business Content Learning: Assurance of Waste?

Paul M. Mason, B. Jay Coleman, Jeffrey W. Steagall, Andres A. Gallo, Michael M. Fabritius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Exit exams have become the currency of choice for both institutions and accrediting bodies seeking to demonstrate student learning. Most researchers have ignored the opportunity costs of these tests and the fundamental question of whether the exams add value to the assessment process already in place on college campuses (course testing and GPA). A statistical model that uses a student's GPA, SAT score, and demographic characteristics predicts the student's Major Field Test (ETSB) score quite well. Furthermore, the opportunity cost of administering these exams at the institution in question exceeds $25,000 annually. The authors argue that the cost-benefit tradeoff of the ETSB exit exam is unfavorable.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)71-77
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of Education for Business
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

  • accreditation
  • assurance of learning
  • Educational Testing Service
  • exit exams
  • logistic regression
  • Business Administration Education
  • College Students
  • Grade Point Average
  • College Entrance Examinations
  • scores
  • Student characteristics
  • Student Evaluation
  • Cost effectiveness

Disciplines

  • Economics
  • Computational Engineering
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Curriculum and Instruction

Cite this