Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

US LRE placement rates for the last 25 Years: Where are we now?

  • Pamela Williamson
  • , David Hoppey
  • , James McLeskey
  • , Erica Bergmann
  • , Hanna Moore
  • The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate suggests a preference for educating students with disabilities in general education settings provided their needs can be met there. This study examined national trends in the educational placements of students with disabilities ages 6 to 17 in the 50 states and the District of Columbia from 1990 through 2015. Data were retrieved electronically from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Census Bureau websites. Cumulative placement rates were then calculated. Findings indicate that from 1990 through 2015, (a) general education placements increased while more restrictive placements decreased, (b) students in secondary schools continued to be placed in more restrictive settings, and (c) the impact of disability categories on national LRE trends varied. Future research is needed to investigate the effect of increased identification rates in specific disability categories on national placement trends and explore how placement practices vary across schools, districts, and states.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)236-244
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • inclusion; least restrictive environment; placement practices; special education law; special education policy

Disciplines

  • Education
  • Special Education and Teaching

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'US LRE placement rates for the last 25 Years: Where are we now?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this