Abstract
After the Holmes Group's report (1990), the concept of the professional development school (PDS) spread quickly as a vehicle for educational reform at both the university and school level. The rapid proliferation of newly established PDS partnerships accentuated concern associated with the lack of conceptual clarity of the PDS concept itself. Levine and Churins (1999) warned the PDS community that this innovative institution needed standards to ensure the necessary rigor, accountability, and sustainability. Through an examination of existing literature and a survey of PDS leadership, this chapter explores the current status of PDS accountability activities as well as the importance of accountability and resource allocation to the success and, perhaps ultimately, the sustainability of the PDS movement.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 531-566 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Teachers College Record |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| State | Published - Dec 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Disciplines
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations
- Psychology
- Sustainability
- Curriculum and Instruction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Do We Know about Accountability and Resources in Professional Development Schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS