Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?

Michael R. Greenberg
, Frank J. Popper
, Heather Barnes Truelove

Vanderbilt University

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	713-731
Número de páginas	19
Publicación	Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volumen	55
N.º	6
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.623070
Estado	Published - jul 2012
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Geography, Planning and Development
Water Science and Technology
General Environmental Science
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Acceder al documento

10.1080/09640568.2011.623070

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{d1e621cfa74e46408c4e8d70d9cd5da0,

title = "Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?",

keywords = "LULUs, NIMBY, TOADS, affect heuristic",

author = "Greenberg, \{Michael R.\} and Popper, \{Frank J.\} and Truelove, \{Heather Barnes\}",

year = "2012",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1080/09640568.2011.623070",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

pages = "713--731",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?

AU - Greenberg, Michael R.

AU - Popper, Frank J.

AU - Truelove, Heather Barnes

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

KW - LULUs

KW - NIMBY

KW - TOADS

KW - affect heuristic

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84858200383

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84858200383#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2011.623070

DO - 10.1080/09640568.2011.623070

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858200383

SN - 0964-0568

VL - 55

SP - 713

EP - 731

JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

IS - 6

ER -