TY - JOUR
T1 - Righting Environmental Wrongs
T2 - Assessing the Role of Legal Systems in Redressing Environmental Grievances
AU - Gellers, Joshua Chad
N1 - Gellers, J. C.. (2011) Righting Environmental Wrongs: Assessing the Role of Legal Systems in Redressing Environmental Grievances. Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 26 (2), pp. 461-492.
PY - 2011/2/26
Y1 - 2011/2/26
N2 - During the second half of the twentieth century, many countries fundamentally altered the way in which their legal systems addressed environmental issues. In particular, legal innovations were developed to offer citizens a means of redressing grievances against the state or private entities for violating environmental regulations. The United States began expanding access to its courts for environmental litigation through a landmark decision that broadened the concept of standing; India enlarged the field of potential claimants in environmental litigation through a landmark decision and innovative constitutional interpretation; Japan sought to provide avenues for obtaining remedies through national environmental legislation, but grievances have been more successfully redressed through major decisions that have expanded the scope of constitutionally guaranteed rights. Despite differences in governmental structure, legal doctrine, and legislation, states have undergone dramatic transformations in the way that the public interfaces with the legal system in order to right environmental wrongs.
AB - During the second half of the twentieth century, many countries fundamentally altered the way in which their legal systems addressed environmental issues. In particular, legal innovations were developed to offer citizens a means of redressing grievances against the state or private entities for violating environmental regulations. The United States began expanding access to its courts for environmental litigation through a landmark decision that broadened the concept of standing; India enlarged the field of potential claimants in environmental litigation through a landmark decision and innovative constitutional interpretation; Japan sought to provide avenues for obtaining remedies through national environmental legislation, but grievances have been more successfully redressed through major decisions that have expanded the scope of constitutionally guaranteed rights. Despite differences in governmental structure, legal doctrine, and legislation, states have undergone dramatic transformations in the way that the public interfaces with the legal system in order to right environmental wrongs.
KW - Environmental Law
KW - Environmental Justice
KW - Human Rights
KW - Locus Standi
KW - Public Interest Litigation
KW - International Norms
KW - United States
KW - India
KW - Japan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856970142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856970142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/11915
M3 - Article
SN - 1049-0280
VL - 26
SP - 461
EP - 492
JO - Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation
JF - Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation
IS - 2
ER -